The Steps 2--3 dichotomy: cross covariances, or none at all #
Paper: R-324 — §4.2 Steps 2–3 — the cross-covariance dichotomy
The proved two-half physical collapse
(twoHalf_lamEps_pow_integral_eq_initialNested) is stated at a selected
residual cross-covariance slot
`R324ResidualCovarianceSlot κp = ↥κp.singles`,
so it cannot be instantiated when the left half's pairing is full. That
is not a gap: a full left half means the contraction has no cross-copy
covariances at all, the two halves of (4.18) are independent, and the
proved deterministicMomentContractionTerm_eq_fullHalfIntegral_mul
factors the term outright.
This module records the dichotomy and its two elementary supports: the two
halves have equally many singles (they are matched by π), and on a full
half the cross-covariance product is the empty product.
On a full half the cross-copy covariance product is the empty product.
The Steps 2--3 dichotomy.
At any contraction entity (κp, κm, π) either both halves are fully
paired — so there are no cross-copy covariances and the two halves of
(4.18) are independent — or the left half has a single, which is exactly
the residual covariance slot the two-half nested bridge consumes. The
disjunction is exhaustive, so Steps 2--3 may branch on it.
Entity-indexed form of the dichotomy.