Hepp-tree cover of the augmented selected cell word #
Within one exact support/raw-profile/endpoint signature fibre, the marked block word is dummy-closed. The augmented pairing is full and respects the augmented word, so every occupied label now occurs at least twice. The augmented word is also in the finite lattice box inherited from the actual torus cells.
Thus every actual selected cell word lies in rdec_repeatedTuples after
augmentation and hence in at least one valid Hepp-tree slice. The passage
from the repeated-tuple carrier to the sum of tree slices is a
nonnegative enlargement because the tree cover can overlap; all
support/profile/endpoint regrouping before it is exact.
The actual finite box #
Natural half-width of the torus grid used by the selected cell partition.
Equations
Instances For
Augmenting one actual marked-block cell word #
Dummy-closed marked-block word attached to one ambient cell index.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Adding copies of two already occupied endpoint labels does not change the finite support.
Every coordinate of an actual ambient cell index lies in the torus grid.
Every label of the local marked-block word remains in the actual torus grid.
Dummy copies preserve membership in the actual torus grid.
The augmented actual marked-block word belongs to the finite bounded tuple carrier.
The dummy-closed word has no singleton occupied value and hence lies in the repeated-tuple carrier used by the Hepp-tree cover.
The first nonnegative enlargement: overlapping tree slices #
Every actual augmented marked-block cell word occurs in at least one valid Hepp-tree realization slice.
A valid tree is either genuinely branched at the root or is the one-leaf tree. The latter is the constant-label base case and must not be silently passed to Proposition 5.7, whose public statement assumes a branched root.
The tree-cover witness can be refined to an admissible injective leaf embedding whose image is exactly the occupied support of the old open word. This is the realization datum consumed by the occupied-label Proposition 5.7 specialization.
The disjunction is intentional: a branched tree enters Proposition 5.7, whereas the one-leaf constant-label tree remains an explicit base case.
A genuine selected physical cell word either belongs to the explicit constant-label leaf-tree base case, or its occupied-label realization feeds directly into the raw-count fixed-endpoint Proposition 5.7 bound.
This theorem is still purely the word-sum consumer. It neither asserts the analytic cell majorant nor suppresses the later cell-volume and automorphism ledgers.