Free marked-automorphism orbits of admissible embeddings #
This file formalizes the finite counting statement in paper §5.3, Step 2,
equation (5.18). For fixed restricted branch data N, its marked-tree
automorphism group reindexes admissible leaf embeddings without changing
their underlying lattice-point set. Since admissible embeddings are
injective and a rooted-tree automorphism is determined by its action on
leaves, this action is free.
Choosing one admissible embedding above each realized set therefore gives an injection
AutHeppMarked(t,N) × realizedSets(N) ↪ admissibleLeafEmbeddings(N),
which yields the desired division-free cardinality inequality.
Elementary extensionality and faithfulness on leaves #
The action of Aut t on the leaves is faithful.
For an injective leaf embedding, reindexing by distinct tree automorphisms gives distinct embeddings.
The fixed-marking action on admissible embeddings #
For canonical restricted branch data, membership in the marked-tree stabilizer fixes the bundled marking literally, not merely on branch vertices. The canonical zero extension is important here.
The marked-tree stabilizer preserves admissibility for the fixed restricted marking.
Reindexing by a tree automorphism preserves the unindexed lattice-point set of an embedding.
The stabilizer itself is independent of the proof term witnessing validity of the restricted marking.
One representative above each realized set #
A noncanonical admissible embedding whose image is the given realized set.
Equations
Instances For
The representative packaged in the finite admissible-embedding carrier.
Equations
Instances For
The product injection and finite count #
Act on one chosen representative over each realized set.
Equations
- Anderson4D.markedOrbitEmbedding N hN p = ⟨Anderson4D.smulLeafEmbedding ↑p.1 ↑(Anderson4D.realizedSetRepresentativeEmbedding N hN p.2), ⋯⟩
Instances For
Freeness on each representative and disjointness of distinct image fibers make the product map injective.
Paper (5.18), finite division-free form.
Proof-irrelevant form of (5.18): the validity proof used to name the stabilizer may differ from the proof used to enumerate the two finite carriers.