Lattice-level assembly after Proposition 5.7 #
This file records the elementary scale-summation and factorial/logarithm ledger used at the end of paper §5.2, equations (5.16)--(5.17). The geometric tree summation and the continuum discretization are kept as separate interfaces; the lemma below closes the final numerical step without hiding its uniform exponential constant.
Independent dyadic-scale summation #
Product weight obtained after summing a Hepp marking from the leaves
toward the root. Coordinates in free carry the logarithmic loss; every
other coordinate carries a summable dyadic gap. This is the factorized
majorant behind paper (5.17).
Equations
Instances For
Factorized geometric summation in (5.17). Each unrestricted scale
costs L, whereas a scale carrying a parent-ratio factor costs at most the
geometric constant 2. The actual increasing-marking domain injects into
this independent gap domain, so this is the reusable numerical estimate
consumed by the tree-specific assembly.
The factorial--logarithm balance #
The elementary inequality after (5.17), natural-scale form.
If the perturbative order satisfies n ≤ K L, then, uniformly for
0 ≤ s ≤ n-2,
(n-s)! L^min(s+1,n-2) ≤ (8 (K+1))^n L^(n-2).
Here L is the number of available dyadic scales (later comparable to
|log ε|). The proof separates the endpoint cases n-s ≤ 3; away from
them, exactly n-s-3 powers of L pay for the factorial, while the cubic
residue is absorbed by 8^n.
Real-valued form used by the analytic assembly. It is an exact cast of
factorial_log_balance_nat, so no Archimedean or asymptotic argument is left
implicit.
Powerset-summed form of the final estimate after (5.17). The hypothesis
B.card ≤ n-2 is the paper's |B|-1 ≤ r-2 ≤ n-2 after removing the root.
The number of choices of W costs at most 2ⁿ, absorbed into the displayed
base 16(K+1).