Product of the two analytic collapse calls #
This file combines Proposition 5.10 on the restricted subtree with the
Proposition 5.9 induction hypothesis on the contracted tree. The contracted
right-hand side is expanded into its W-sum, so each summand is exactly
combinedCollapseTerm.
The combined analytic estimate #
theorem
Anderson4D.collapse_analytic_product_le_sum_combinedCollapseTerm
{C0 D : ℝ}
(hsingle : SingleScaleEstimate C0)
{t : PlaneTree}
(ht : t.isValid = true)
(hroot : t.rootV ∈ t.BranchNodes)
(Nm : t.HeppMarking)
(mu : t.Multiplicities)
(compound : Finset t.VPos)
(hcompound : compound ⊆ t.Leaves)
(z : HeppLeaf t → Fin 4 → ℤ)
(hsep : IsSeparatedEmbedding Nm z)
(hdiam : SatisfiesSubtreeDiameter Nm mu z)
{r : t.VPos}
(hr : IsLowestCollapseEligible Nm mu r)
(lstar : InsideLeaf r)
(d : RawCollapseData (InsideLeaf r) (OutsideLeaf r))
(hSpec : CollapseMultiplicitySpec (splitLeafMultiplicity mu r) d)
(hblocks : 2 ≤ d.blocks.length)
(hIH : InductiveConclusion C0 D (t.contractAt ↑r))
:
4 ^ d.insideLength * (↑(collapseCutCount d + 1).factorial)⁻¹ * paperSum (leafMultiplicity (restrictMultiplicities mu r))
(singleScaleChainWeight (restrictEmbedding z r) d.adjacentCutIndices) * paperSum (leafMultiplicity (contractMultiplicities mu r (collapseCutCount d) ⋯))
(primitiveSeparatedChainWeight (contractEmbedding z r lstar)) ≤ ∑ W ∈ (nonrootBranches (t.contractAt ↑r)).powerset,
combinedCollapseTerm C0 D d.insideLength (collapseCutCount d) d.collapsed.length Nm mu compound r ⋯ W
The two analytic calls in the eligible-collapse step, multiplied and
expanded into the contracted-tree W-sum.