Documentation

Anderson4D.PermSum.CollapseBase

No-collapse base case for Proposition 5.9 #

When (5.40) has no eligible branch, the whole tree satisfies (5.38). Proposition 5.10 is then applied with no skipped edge. This file records the pointwise and sum-level bridges for that reduction, together with a dyadic scale which always dominates a prescribed natural scale.

With no skipped indices, NoAdjacentEqual implies the single-scale adjacency predicate.

@[simp]

Omitting no edges leaves the chain product unchanged.

Pointwise bridge from the P-5.9 summand to P-5.10 with O = ∅.

The pointwise base bridge summed in the exact paperSum normalization.

theorem Anderson4D.exists_dyadicNat_ge (q : ℕ) :
∃ (R : ℕ), IsDyadicNat R ∧ q ≤ R

Every natural scale is dominated by a natural dyadic scale.

theorem Anderson4D.singleScaleRHS_zero_skips (C0 : ℝ) (m R : ℕ) (t : PlaneTree) (Nm : t.HeppMarking) (mu : t.Multiplicities) (compound : Finset t.VPos) :
singleScaleRHS C0 m 0 R t Nm mu compound = (((C0 ^ (↑m / 2) * sqrtFactorial m * ∏ l ∈ simpleLeaves t compound, sqrtFactorial (mu.m l)) * ∏ l ∈ compoundLeaves t compound, factorialThreeQuarters (mu.m l)) * ∏ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, ↑(scaleN Nm v) ^ (-2 * (↑(gamma2 mu compound v) - 1))) * ∏ v ∈ nonrootBranches t, parentScaleRatio Nm v ^ 3

At zero skipped edges, the P-5.10 right side is independent of the auxiliary dyadic scale R.

theorem Anderson4D.singleScaleRHS_zero_le_inductiveRHS (C0 D : ℝ) (hC0 : 1000 < C0) (hD : D = Real.exp (C0 ^ 10)) (m R : ℕ) (t : PlaneTree) (Nm : t.HeppMarking) (mu : t.Multiplicities) (compound : Finset t.VPos) :
singleScaleRHS C0 m 0 R t Nm mu compound ≤ inductiveRHS C0 D m t Nm mu compound

The zero-skipped single-scale right side is bounded by the P-5.9 right side. It is exactly the W = ∅ summand, apart from the smaller C0^(m/2) coefficient and the absent D factor.

theorem Anderson4D.noEligible_case_of_singleScale {C0 D : ℝ} (hsingle : SingleScaleEstimate C0) (hD : D = Real.exp (C0 ^ 10)) (m : ℕ) (t : PlaneTree) (Nm : t.HeppMarking) (mu : t.Multiplicities) (compound : Finset t.VPos) (z : HeppLeaf t → Fin 4 → ℤ) (ht : t.isValid = true) (hroot : t.rootV ∈ t.BranchNodes) (hcompound : compound ⊆ t.Leaves) (htotal : totalMultiplicity mu = m) (hsep : IsSeparatedEmbedding Nm z) (hempty : eligibleBranches Nm mu = ∅) :

Complete no-eligible-branch case of Proposition 5.9, parameterized by Proposition 5.10 with the same constant C0.