Geometric replacement bounds for the collapse induction #
The proof of Proposition 5.9 replaces every point in a collapsed subtree
by one distinguished leaf. The paper prints the weaker comparability
(5.41), but the preceding argument gives a quarter-distance perturbation.
Retaining that stronger form makes each changed edge cost at most 2;
with at most 2n boundary edges this is the stated 4^n loss in (5.43).
theorem
Anderson4D.prod_le_four_pow_mul_prod_of_card_le_two_mul
{ι : Type u_1}
[DecidableEq ι]
(S : Finset ι)
(f g : ι → ℝ)
(n : ℕ)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ S, 0 ≤ f i)
(hg : ∀ i ∈ S, 0 ≤ g i)
(hfg : ∀ i ∈ S, f i ≤ 2 * g i)
(hcard : S.card ≤ 2 * n)
:
At most 2n replacement edges, each costing at most 2, give the
4^n loss printed in (5.43).