Renaming invariance of the Proposition 5.9 summand #
The collapse induction replaces the Hepp-leaf alphabet by the canonical inside/outside sum alphabet. This file records that both word restrictions and the positional chain statistic are invariant under that replacement.
Word predicates #
A finite set of letters and its image under an equivalence occupy the same positions in a renamed word.
The paper's proper-leaf-block restriction is invariant under renaming the alphabet.
Iff form used to rewrite the indicator in the P-5.9 summand.
Position-chain statistic #
The Hepp chain formula on an arbitrary finite alphabet equipped with
lattice positions. On the actual Hepp-leaf alphabet this is definitionally
heppChainWeight.
Equations
- Anderson4D.alphabetChainWeight z w = ∏ j : Anderson4D.AdjacentIndex m, Anderson4D.latticeEdgeWeight (z (w ↑j)) (z (w (Anderson4D.adjacentSucc j)))
Instances For
Pulling positions back by the inverse equivalence makes the chain product exactly invariant under word renaming.
Direct Hepp-leaf form when both alphabets happen to be leaf types.
The P-5.9 pointwise statistic on an arbitrary finite alphabet with lattice positions.
Equations
Instances For
The complete primitive-and-separated chain statistic is exactly invariant under alphabet renaming.
Direct Hepp-leaf form of invariance for the complete P-5.9 summand.
primitiveSeparatedChainWeight expressed without loss on any renamed
finite alphabet.
The canonical inside/outside leaf split #
The original Hepp embedding pulled back to the inside/outside alphabet.
Equations
- Anderson4D.splitLeafPosition r z l = z ((Anderson4D.leafInsideOutsideEquiv r).symm l)
Instances For
Inverse orientation used after paperSum_eq_splitLeafAlphabet: the
pulled-back original summand is directly the same statistic on a split word.
Sum-level tree-facing corollary: after splitting the leaf alphabet, the P-5.9 summand is literally the same primitive-and-separated chain statistic with the pulled-back positions.