Documentation

Anderson4D.PermSum.SingleScalePowerLedger

The power ledger in paper equation (5.71) #

This file lifts the nodewise exponent identity already proved in SingleScaleSetup to the direct finite-product identity used in Step 1 of Proposition 5.10. The distinguished leaf is kept explicit.

Branch nodes whose subtree does not contain the distinguished leaf.

Equations
Instances For

    A branch child is off the distinguished path exactly when its subtree does not contain the distinguished leaf.

    Equations
    Instances For

      Collected exponent of one branch scale in the last ratio product of paper (5.71).

      Equations
      Instances For
        theorem Anderson4D.branchesOffLeafPath_ratio_product {t : PlaneTree} (ht : t.isValid = true) (l₀ : HeppLeaf t) (N : t.VPos → ℝ) (hN : ∀ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, 0 < N v) :
        ∏ v ∈ branchesOffLeafPath l₀, N (PlaneTree.parentV v) / N v = ∏ p ∈ t.BranchNodes, N p ^ branchesOffLeafPathRatioExponent p l₀

        The final ratio product in (5.71), regrouped as one integer power at every branch node.

        theorem Anderson4D.paper571_rhs_product_eq_collected {t : PlaneTree} (ht : t.isValid = true) (hroot : t.rootV ∈ t.BranchNodes) (mu : t.Multiplicities) (compound : Finset t.VPos) (l₀ : HeppLeaf t) (N : t.VPos → ℝ) (hN : ∀ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, 0 < N v) :
        ((∏ l ∈ simpleLeaves t compound, N (PlaneTree.parentV l) ^ 2) * ∏ l ∈ compoundLeaves t compound, N (PlaneTree.parentV l) ^ ↑(mu.m l)) * N (PlaneTree.parentV ↑l₀) ^ (-1) * ∏ v ∈ branchesOffLeafPath l₀, N (PlaneTree.parentV v) / N v = ∏ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, N v ^ paper571RhsExponent mu compound l₀ v

        The uncollected right side of (5.71) equals the product carrying the nodewise exponent paper571RhsExponent.

        theorem Anderson4D.paper571_direct_product_identity {t : PlaneTree} (ht : t.isValid = true) (hroot : t.rootV ∈ t.BranchNodes) (mu : t.Multiplicities) (compound : Finset t.VPos) (l₀ : HeppLeaf t) (N : t.VPos → ℝ) (hN : ∀ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, 0 < N v) :
        ∏ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, N v ^ (↑(gamma2 mu compound v) - 1) = ((∏ l ∈ simpleLeaves t compound, N (PlaneTree.parentV l) ^ 2) * ∏ l ∈ compoundLeaves t compound, N (PlaneTree.parentV l) ^ ↑(mu.m l)) * N (PlaneTree.parentV ↑l₀) ^ (-1) * ∏ v ∈ branchesOffLeafPath l₀, N (PlaneTree.parentV v) / N v

        Paper equation (5.71) in direct finite-product form.

        theorem Anderson4D.paper572_branchPower_le_leafPower {t : PlaneTree} (ht : t.isValid = true) (hroot : t.rootV ∈ t.BranchNodes) (mu : t.Multiplicities) (compound : Finset t.VPos) (l₀ : HeppLeaf t) (N : t.VPos → ℝ) (hN : ∀ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, 0 < N v) (hmono : ∀ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, v ≠ t.rootV → N v ≤ N (PlaneTree.parentV v)) :
        ∏ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, N v ^ (-2 * (↑(gamma2 mu compound v) - 1)) ≤ ((∏ l ∈ simpleLeaves t compound, N (PlaneTree.parentV l) ^ (-4)) * ∏ l ∈ compoundLeaves t compound, N (PlaneTree.parentV l) ^ (-2 * ↑(mu.m l))) * N (PlaneTree.parentV ↑l₀) ^ 2

        Paper (5.72)'s power inequality. Squaring the inverse of (5.71) leaves an extra negative square of the off-path parent ratios; it is at most one because branch scales increase toward the root.

        theorem Anderson4D.singleScale_branchPower_le_leafPower {t : PlaneTree} (ht : t.isValid = true) (hroot : t.rootV ∈ t.BranchNodes) (Nm : t.HeppMarking) (mu : t.Multiplicities) (compound : Finset t.VPos) (l₀ : HeppLeaf t) :
        ∏ v ∈ t.BranchNodes, ↑(scaleN Nm v) ^ (-2 * (↑(gamma2 mu compound v) - 1)) ≤ ((∏ l ∈ simpleLeaves t compound, ↑(scaleN Nm (PlaneTree.parentV l)) ^ (-4)) * ∏ l ∈ compoundLeaves t compound, ↑(scaleN Nm (PlaneTree.parentV l)) ^ (-2 * ↑(mu.m l))) * ↑(scaleN Nm (PlaneTree.parentV ↑l₀)) ^ 2

        Specialization of the (5.72) power ledger to the dyadic Hepp marking.

        Quantitative form of the first reduction after (5.69): the missing cube of the parent-scale-ratio product can be inserted at exponential cost.